There is an inside sales playbook that many SaaS companies use. And with good reason. It’s a tried and true, time-tested way to sell SaaS. It’s effective and proven. If you work for a B2B SaaS company you probably know this playbook well. It’s some variation of….

BDRs work inbound leads (generated by marketing and thrown over the fence to sales upon some predefined level of warm nurture qualification). SDRs work outbound leads. Both of these groups tee up qualified opportunities for account executives.  Account execs may be organized by region, industry, customer segment, company size, or size of prize (SOP). Qualification is based on ideal customer profile + BANT or MEDDIC or some other variation. The sales stages go from qualifying to qualified to demo to evaluation to procurement to close. Sales are done “inside” with little in-person travel needed. Sales cycles are somewhere between 15-90 days. There is a sales tech stack that includes cadence sequencing, call recording, list building and prospecting, CRM, etc.

Yada, yada.

If you’ve brushed up against SaaS sales, you’ve seen this model. There are variations and customizations based on company stage, ARPU, and industry. But it all stems from the same core playbook, pioneered at companies like Salesforce.com, where it worked exceptionally well. And continues to work well for thousands upon thousands of SaaS organizations.

Enter product-led growth, where a company isn’t pulled along by sales, and marketing isn’t the only fuel in the engine.

So, how does the SaaS sales model fit into product-led growth?

It fits. But it needs to be applied thoughtfully, and with some tweaks.

Here’s what I have seen work well (in no particular order):

Just let the customers buy

I think the main thing is to get out of the way of product-led growth. The SaaS sales playbook is pretty prescriptive. To make it work in a product-led organization it’s important to get rid of some of the processes and prescription about how customers are supposed to buy.